Attacking Rand Paul, Progressives Demonstrate Their Ridiculousness

Posted by Cathy Reisenwitz March 11, 2013 4 Comments 923 views

In Bro-gressive Values Revealed: Attacking the Messenger By Any Means Necessary Adele Stan criticizes Salon’s David Sirota for giving kudos to Rand Paul because Rand Paul has also stood up for things she doesn’t like.

So Rand Paul shouldn’t be praised for standing up for civil liberties because he hasn’t stood up for some progressive values in the past?

The easily-accessible irony here is simply divine. I found no fewer than 6 stories praising Obama on Stan’s Alternet bio page. Yet Obama has consistently not only failed to stand up for progressive values but actually worked hard in stark contradiction to those values.

By Stan’s own logic she should be “horrified” to see herself “lauding as courageous and ‘heroic’” a murdering, secretive, civil-liberties-violating president.

She says:

Never mind that to stand with Rand is to stand for a man who sponsored “fetal personhood” amendment that would “ end abortion on demand once and for all,” in Paul’s words, even for rape victims. Try not to notice that to stand with Rand is to exalt a guy who opposes the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that desegregated restaurants, lunch counters and housing. He’s also opposed to the Americans With Disabilities Act, preferring the specter of people in wheelchairs barred from full participation in public life to an inconvenient demand on proprietors of establishments otherwise open to the public.

Well, then to praise Obama, Stan must be standing for a man who

  • Assassinates American citizens without trial.
  • Perpetrates policy of secret drone strikes with horrifying collateral damage, including the killing of a 16-year-old boy and many other documented child killings.
  • Has utterly failed to advocate for gay marriage in any useful way.
  • Perpetrates armed raids of state-legal marijuana dispensaries. One entrepreneur actually died in jail after being denied medical care.
  • Has and continues to prosecute more whistleblowers under the Espionage Act than all previous presidents combined.
  • Has and continues to deport more immigrants in his first term than George W. Bush did in two.

I would have thought this would be too obvious to need to be stated, but here it is anyway: You can stand with a person on one issue with which you agree with this person without advocating all their positions.


About Cathy Reisenwitz

Cathy Reisenwitz is a D.C.-based writer and political commentator. She runs Sex and the State and writes regularly for Doublethink magazine as well as Thoughts on Liberty. When not fighting the state, she reads girl blogs, tech blogs, politics blogs and career blogs. She loves non-fiction books (currently on a positive psychology kick). And she spends a good chunk of time at Gold’s Gym.

  • miguel_gomez

    Hi, Cathy. Miguel here. I wholeheartedly agree with what you wrote here. I don’t like Rand’s policy on abortion, either, but I think his stance on everything else pretty much places him in the libertarian spectrum nevertheless. I am iffy about him, but I stand with him as someone who speaks about something that transcends petty problems like a wheelchair ramp. I don’t mean to rag on the disabled, but I’m tired of progressives saying you’re against disabled people when you protest the ADA. It’s not called “being against the disabled.” It’s called “being for small businesses not having to stand against lawsuits for people who never visited their establishments in the first place.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=570335230 Evan Comeaux

    This is great! Thank you for writing this. I’ve come across so many ‘progressives’ who claim to support civil liberties but just can’t stop bashing Rand; even over something he tweeted years ago. I didn’t even realize at the time how I’ve been willing to work with people I disagree with on many things to slightly advance liberty, and how I should apply this to others as well. The inability to stand with someone because of something they said back when is ridiculous.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joy.holowicki Joy Holowicki

    “[Obama] Has utterly failed to advocate for gay marriage in any useful way” I’d disagree on that point -he’s changing the conversation in black communities. The way he publicized this change was important and purposeful -as Archbishop Robinson pointed out, it has provided a space for people to change their minds without shame.

    Other than that, I agree. This whole episode reinforces Rachel’s description of the focus on “winning” in Democrat party politics -http://thoughtsonliberty.com/confessions-of-a-former-democrat-my-journey-to-libertarianism

  • Jim Hodge

    “Jim Hodge – Allied Home Mortgage have been attacked by lawyers and the liberal press. A self made man of humble means is working hard to restore the jobs lost by these baseless attacks”

    http://www.Jimhodgeblog.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Social Followers

Find Us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter